Sorry, creating a throwaway account for this since I mostly lurk on HN.
The code used to build Datanyze was stolen from a pre-existing internal tool Ilya was hired to work on at his previous company. All of the original UI looked exactly the same, it tracked all the same services, and the domain was registered while he was still an employee.
Interesting story. It seems the case went to arbitration due to a clause in the Ilya Semin employment contract and thus out of the light of regular courts:
Hello, everyone. Founder of Datanyze here. I just wanted to respond to this comment as I did not notice it until recently. This throw-away account was wisely created to avoid a libel counter-lawsuit. Torbit indeed tried to sue me and the company...unsuccessfully. Their accusations were ridiculous from the beginning and my position was very open at all times. I offered them to do a code comparison or anything else it would take to prove that I did not steal any of Torbit's IP. Datanyze was written using a totally different set of tools. They refused and kept throwing money into the lawsuit. Torbit was basically claiming that they invented web crawling and predictably failed. The judge has made his decision, but some (not all) of Torbit's investors and employees keep trolling using these 'throwaway' accounts.
> “So we can tell their competitors, and they can call those companies, and the sales rep can say: “I see you’re checking out our competitor’s solution right now … why don’t you try ours as well?” That’s pure marketing magic.
"Pure marketing magic."
I'm in marketing and I understand why that might be a useful followup, but if you step out of your marketing shoes - I think I would simply find that creepy.
Seems to be much the same, but with a slightly more b2b marketing element and higher pricing with less data! Have used builtwith before and was very happy with their monthly ($299) plan. If anything I'd expect a competitor to offer lower prices.
If want to check an individual site, if is free. But if you want to set up monitors across a swath of sites and technologies, they have plans priced from $295-995/mo. https://builtwith.com/plans
I think the biggest difference is that BuiltWith cannot tell when somebody started to use your competitor YESTERDAY. By the time they report it, it's already too late.
Another thing is Datanyze is more enterprise oriented (Salesforce integration, People/Company information, etc)
...which it increasingly is, as more and more 3rd-party services provide client-side javascript SDKs (head over to a billion young startup sites and see if they don't have a 'mixpanel' object loaded), as well as the telltale signs in markup and CSS. As well as API keys for various services hanging around in their client-side code, which is a little mind-boggling.
Anyway pretty brilliant idea to keep running stats on this stuff. $$$$$
Analytics, highcharts, status page, blogging tools, ticketing software, project management software, crm etc, etc... The article gives more than a couple of examples.
Anything that offers third party js or offers hosted solutions is going to be pretty easy to find.
Well I could tell what versions of Office software they were using by tracking these files for a company over time: Search Google for: site:starbucks.com filetype:doc
Doing an analysis of the files coming out of these companies could have a much wider appeal than just to what their website hosts too! If you can get them to go to your website, you can also glean an awful lot from their browser. There can be tons of legitimate reasons they might need to click on a link under your control, but as long as they do you also get what you need.
Not sure how accurate this can be if you have everything behind a secure login.
We have clients trying our SaaS software but nothing is on their website to indicate such, its all securely hosted by us via login.
So unless they are sniffing traffic, reading our secure web logs or our potential clients are posting on social media, there is no way they would know.
I wonder if there is going to be a market in the future like the current SEO one that is all about masking what technology/products you are using. The idea being to deny your competitors from knowing more about you such as from using this product.
I mean the current SEO market. There is a lot of investment in making your website adhere to best SEO practices. If things like this take off (and it appears it is) then there might be a new market to disguise and hide the tech your business runs to avoid providing your competitors with information.
As a provider, do you feel happy that the stats for your service are out in the open? Turning it around, do you feel any value from seeing how you compare to other providers? :)
As a customer, I feel unfairly targeted without my participation for the profit of a third party. This makes money, but it does not make the world a better place to want to live in.
The code used to build Datanyze was stolen from a pre-existing internal tool Ilya was hired to work on at his previous company. All of the original UI looked exactly the same, it tracked all the same services, and the domain was registered while he was still an employee.
A lawsuit was filed, but was dropped because the company was working on closing an acquisition anyway. (http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/other-statutory-actions/c...)
Just wanted to get this out there so people know they are supporting blatant IP theft.