Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Github should have more project meta-data, rather than sifting through the README. For example, Production Status: experimental / alpha / it's complicated / production / paid support. Pull request status, standards, response time-frame and response time-frame history would be nice. Canonical URL could become a cross-VCS hosting standard that fixes the annoying "this project has moved" messages.

Simple configurations could change meta-data based on activity over time, or voting, or (?). Default settings like "Mark this repo Abandoned after 3 months without commits" would cleanup confusion for most small projects.



Sourceforge has that, because beyond being a collaboration platform it also had goals of being a software directory and distribution site.

Github seems to carefully avoid picking up features that position it as a directory or distributor, though.


Agreed, a "health status" for projects would be very beneficial, and probably not that hard to implement.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: