At the end of the article, I actually found myself thinking, "Hm, that really wasn't terrible." Then I came here for the comments.
The "techy hipsters" bit really wasn't an egregious journalistic error, but it wasn't real professional either. There wasn't really anything wrong with the article, but you also get the impression that, in terms of writing at least, the folks there are amateurs.
Not that that's a bad thing! Maybe it's unfair of us to hold them to the same standards as, say ... Macworld. ahem ;-)
At the end of the article, I actually found myself thinking, "Hm, that really wasn't terrible." Then I came here for the comments.
The "techy hipsters" bit really wasn't an egregious journalistic error, but it wasn't real professional either. There wasn't really anything wrong with the article, but you also get the impression that, in terms of writing at least, the folks there are amateurs.
Not that that's a bad thing! Maybe it's unfair of us to hold them to the same standards as, say ... Macworld. ahem ;-)