Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The minimum payout was 1% of the house bankroll

You mean "maximum" and 0.5% (after 1% was found to be too much).

"Investing" in the house was generally too slow and boring for gamblers to consider. They are used to being able to double (or lose) their stake in a fraction of a second. By being part of the bankroll they get to make a 1% return per week if they're lucky. The site ran for a year and made investors a total of just over 40% in that year.

For a gambler accustomed to making 100% (or -100%) per second, 40% per year is insignificant. To anyone else of course it's huge.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: