I don't know your age, nor do I care. Your comment (and others here) just strikes me as unimaginative and slightly self-aggrandizing; pontification on the value of shared meals and slowing down makes for boring reading. It's fine that you (and I don't mean just you) don't have an interest in Soylent, but I don't have an interest in getting a car, and yet I don't go around posting on Tesla threads about the value of walking and the dangers of cars.
Do you know the Onion's story of the man who mentions he has no TV[1]? That's how those posts sound to me.
I don't have a horse in this race, I'm not in any way associated with Soylent, nor do I even plan to buy a pack. I don't trust it as a meal replacement, and I think their claims are overreaching. I have no problem with concrete criticism, and you don't see me replying to ("attacking", as you put it) people raising valid questions, just those posting just to tell us how much they don't need it and those writing unprovable claims.
And they may be 9 posts (although they were only 8 before this post), but most are back-and-forth with people that replied to me.
Do you know the Onion's story of the man who mentions he has no TV[1]? That's how those posts sound to me.
I don't have a horse in this race, I'm not in any way associated with Soylent, nor do I even plan to buy a pack. I don't trust it as a meal replacement, and I think their claims are overreaching. I have no problem with concrete criticism, and you don't see me replying to ("attacking", as you put it) people raising valid questions, just those posting just to tell us how much they don't need it and those writing unprovable claims.
And they may be 9 posts (although they were only 8 before this post), but most are back-and-forth with people that replied to me.
[1] http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-man-constantly-mention...