I got the same feeling while reading this. Even if all of the author's pet peeves were warranted, and many of them seem to be, the rambling, unorganized style of writing makes the points seem less credible.

Maybe it was written that way on purpose, for some kind of effect. Or maybe (I'm guilty of this) it's just a blog, not an essay, and the writer didn't particularly feel like putting in the effort to edit.

But I think it would have been much stronger with some structure to the complains, so that the reader knows what he's getting into when he begins reading, and knows what the overarching point is, without having to piece it together himself.