Edit: I do find the Randian (or more likely “rant” typo) discourse somewhat polemic. You merely substitute dysfunctional fundamentalist / absolutist system A for fundamentalist / absolutist system B.
Having read the article, I see no such hint of abolishment or abandonment of the capitalist system.
What I do see however, is the notion that such fundamentalism should be tempered with balancing laws or cultural restraints.
Surely this isn't such an apocalyptic notion, is it?
ISWYDT
Edit: I do find the Randian (or more likely “rant” typo) discourse somewhat polemic. You merely substitute dysfunctional fundamentalist / absolutist system A for fundamentalist / absolutist system B.
Having read the article, I see no such hint of abolishment or abandonment of the capitalist system.
What I do see however, is the notion that such fundamentalism should be tempered with balancing laws or cultural restraints.
Surely this isn't such an apocalyptic notion, is it?