This is untrue, but it is hard to get international numbers.
In the US alone, it is about one death a year, purely by OSHA standards. This doesn't include things like "struck by robot, died three days later due to brain haemorrhage".
Interesting, thanks. I went back and found the article I had read about this awhile back and I guess it was specific data about robot arms and probably wasn't entirely comprehensive:
Edit: one of those are a stretch calling it a "robot" A conveyor belt is a robot? Also, 33 results for robot, but 108 for Forklift and 11 for microwave, is it really all the much more dangerous than any other equipment? Should we ban microwaves (deliberate hyperbole, I realize those weren't deaths)?
I can't read the economist article "reached your reading limit" :(
77 accidents- I assume that's injuries, not deaths, right?
I would consider the OSHA count as incomplete for the reason you say- but I doubt there is more accurate data.
Right now I'd say the numbers look reasonable to not justify preventing the entertainment industry from using robot automation in movie making alongside actors (I think that's what was being suggested?).
The more pressing concern with putting actors in the mix is that they are necessarily untrained or poorly trained participants.
Most of these accidents happen with trained personnel.
I'm not saying that Bot and Dolly shouldn't do what they're doing. I'm just interested in what their safety procedure is to prevent accidents. "Don't get hit" is not a procedure.
In the US alone, it is about one death a year, purely by OSHA standards. This doesn't include things like "struck by robot, died three days later due to brain haemorrhage".
OSHA: https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/AccidentSearch.search?acc_keyw...
Economist: 77 accidents with industrial robots in 2005 alone - http://www.economist.com/node/7001829
Research paper: 103 self reported and survey responded by 1995 - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.4530050304/ab...