Don't remailer services solve the metadata anonymity?
I understand forwarding after a variable waiting period also
frustrates sender address detection. Finland still good hosts for these?
Wikipedia:
An anonymous remailer is a server that receives messages with embedded instructions on where to send them next, and that forwards them without revealing where they originally came from. There are Cypherpunk anonymous remailers, Mixmaster anonymous remailers, and nym servers, among others, which differ in how they work, in the policies they adopt, and in the type of attack on anonymity of e-mail they can (or are intended to) resist.
> At some point, you'll have to either give up ... security (you'll have to trust something you're not in control of).
The anonymous remailer must be trusted for this to work. And this doesn't get around the fact that email is broken generally. Companies wont start using anonymous remailers.
I understand forwarding after a variable waiting period also frustrates sender address detection. Finland still good hosts for these?
Wikipedia:
An anonymous remailer is a server that receives messages with embedded instructions on where to send them next, and that forwards them without revealing where they originally came from. There are Cypherpunk anonymous remailers, Mixmaster anonymous remailers, and nym servers, among others, which differ in how they work, in the policies they adopt, and in the type of attack on anonymity of e-mail they can (or are intended to) resist.