Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He's pandering to a simplistic interpretation of the Constitution. Back in 1979, the Supreme Court explained why searching phone records did not require a warrant or constitute a search under the 4th amendment.


Simplistic, or honest? And do you mean "explained", or "rationalized"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: