Maybe, but my own unscientific, vague sense is that I've been seeing multiple bitcoin related submissions to HN every day for quite some time now. At this stage all of the arguments have been hashed and rehashed (ho ho) in the comment threads to the extent that they're getting pretty repetitive and tedious (especially since so many of them are so political).
So, sure, it was marginally interesting a few days ago that bitcoin was up a significant amount so we had multiple articles about that, and then it was up the next day too so we had some articles, and then there were opinion pieces about why it was a bad idea / good idea, none of which really said anything much new, then there were columns about how it was becoming mainstream (which was obvious if you'd been following all the bitcoin startups that also get posted to HN), then today we find it's down an unusual amount. Surely you can see how this is becoming a little grating even for someone who started out with an interest in the topic.
Maybe, but my own unscientific, vague sense is that I've been seeing multiple bitcoin related submissions to HN every day for quite some time now. At this stage all of the arguments have been hashed and rehashed (ho ho) in the comment threads to the extent that they're getting pretty repetitive and tedious (especially since so many of them are so political).
So, sure, it was marginally interesting a few days ago that bitcoin was up a significant amount so we had multiple articles about that, and then it was up the next day too so we had some articles, and then there were opinion pieces about why it was a bad idea / good idea, none of which really said anything much new, then there were columns about how it was becoming mainstream (which was obvious if you'd been following all the bitcoin startups that also get posted to HN), then today we find it's down an unusual amount. Surely you can see how this is becoming a little grating even for someone who started out with an interest in the topic.