Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think everybody here would agree with your correction to that claim. Unless, however, we'd interpret that a bit differently. My take on this approach (coming from developing a similar extension to the one by Owen) - and what I believe Owen meant there - is that you might be relatively save as long as you 'fly under the radar'. It might be based on the naive believe if that if you aren't yet directly targeted, attempts like these can go unnoticed.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: