Perhaps you should reread your comment then read mine to help you grok. I could say the same about your comment. What does the authors comfort have to do with anything? You simply ignored their source refuting that these services are optional and attacked the author.
At least I'm actually talking about the subject and you continue to offer nothing but passive aggressive Ad hominem attacks. I'm not at all surprised and I anticipate another comment from you along the same lines.
Oh, that's easy: I think you should feel a little uncomfortable telling someone else you think they're being misleading, because it's another way of saying they're being deliberately deceptive, which is not something you'd say to their face.
I'm sure it's something I've said too, and if I was called out on it, I'd like to think I'd agree and amend my comment.
It is a little strange to call that point out as "ad hominem", for whatever it's worth.
At least I'm actually talking about the subject and you continue to offer nothing but passive aggressive Ad hominem attacks. I'm not at all surprised and I anticipate another comment from you along the same lines.