Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're just reciting the standard line which I already acknowledged in my comment. My point was that some of the most promising avenues of research are ignored because of the lack of patentability. How do you address that point?


Would they be addressed if patents didn't exist? I doubt it.


That's exactly GP's point: If you can't patent it, it won't get made.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: