>The maturity of systemd is at the root of the problem here.
That is pretty much what I came in here to say. It seems like OpenBSD is trying to have it both ways: Include all the latest and greatest toys and still thoroughly audit everything that changes between releases. But it's new toys, secure, cheap. Pick two.
Is it really the end of the world if OpenBSD bears a closer resemblance to Debian Stable for the sake of security? Why is 'latest Gnome' a requirement? Just stick with older versions of everything until the new APIs stabilize and mature.
But the problems with systemd aren't an isolated case, and they aren't technical, they're political. And political problems generally don't get better when a technical solution is applied; in this case, waiting it out just silences OpenBSD's voice in the potential discussion. So I'm glad they're making an effort to engage the community and look for alternatives to the political problem.
I'm deliberately not saying exactly what the political problem is – I'm not "framing" it one way or another.
That is pretty much what I came in here to say. It seems like OpenBSD is trying to have it both ways: Include all the latest and greatest toys and still thoroughly audit everything that changes between releases. But it's new toys, secure, cheap. Pick two.
Is it really the end of the world if OpenBSD bears a closer resemblance to Debian Stable for the sake of security? Why is 'latest Gnome' a requirement? Just stick with older versions of everything until the new APIs stabilize and mature.