Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I disagree. He would be using taxpayer money to boost his preferred speech. And it is essentially campaign funding for the GOP. It should be treated as such.




I think that line of argument would work in my country of birth, the UK, but I don't think it works in the USA.

You do not lose your right to free speech by providing contractual services to the US government.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: