Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yea, that is a big caveat to ZeroFS. Single point of failure. It is like saying I can write a faster etcd by only having a single node. Sure, that is possible, but the hard part of distributed systems is the coordination, and coordination always makes performance worse.

I personally have went with Ceph for distributed storage. I personally have a lot more confidence in Ceph over JuiceFS and ZeroFS, but realize building and running a ceph cluster is more complex, but with that complexity you get much cheaper S3, block storage, and cephfs.



I replaced a GlusterFS cluster with JuiceFS some years ago and it's been a relief. Just much easier to manage.


Some users use JuiceFS with CephFS RADOS, as alternative with Ceph MDS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: