Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If you violate a patent you know exists, you are liable for treble damages.

Not quite. First, in cases of willful infringement, the judge can --- but need not --- award up to treble damages. Second, a patent owner seeking to prove that infringement was willful must show, among other things, either:

(1) that the accused infringer knew, not just of the existence of the patent, but of an objectively high likelihood of infringement of a valid patent;

OR

(2) that this objectively defined risk was so obvious that the accused infringer should have known it.

If the accused infringer puts on a reasonable defense, it often negates the "objectively high likelihood" element.

See generally http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-clarified-for-will...

NB: Issued patents are presumed valid until proven otherwise --- and according to the Supreme Court, that proof must be not merely by a preponderance of the evidence, but by clear and convincing evidence. That was the Supreme Court's holding in last year's Microsoft v. i4i opinion; see http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/microsoft-v-i4i-supr...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: