> all of that "innate knowledge" still fits into under 1 gigabyte of compressed DNA.
Yes, the same way Turing completeness fits in 8bits, which is both perfectly true (see rule 110) and perfectly useless to derive any conclusion about the limitation of innate knowledge.
Similarly, just because you can encode the number Pi in just two bytes (the ASCII for both “p” and “i” letters) it doesn't mean the number contains only two bytes of entropy.
Yes, the same way Turing completeness fits in 8bits, which is both perfectly true (see rule 110) and perfectly useless to derive any conclusion about the limitation of innate knowledge.
Similarly, just because you can encode the number Pi in just two bytes (the ASCII for both “p” and “i” letters) it doesn't mean the number contains only two bytes of entropy.