Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Isn't this literally what podman-systemd does?

That was my point, basically.

You have two options:

1) the usual `curl` or `wget` to fetch the binary and the lib(s) and all the work of validating and putting them in place and the like and _then_ you can use a systemd/.service file to set up controls for the bin

2) podman pull and then either ask podman to make a .service file for you or write your own

because only one of the two approaches has solved the package/distribution issue, containers are _not_ "less relevant given that systemd can twiddle the same isolation bits"



What "validating" does docker/podman pull do that is in excess of a curl of a file?

One of the advantages of a real package manager is that it checks signatures on the content that is downloaded. The supply chain on a linux distro's package repos is much harder to break into than typosquatting into a docker registry somewhere.


> What "validating" does docker/podman pull do that is in excess of a curl of a file?

Every single thing has a sha hash so verifying that I actually downloaded what I meant to download is easy. This gets tedious if I have to `curl https://github.com/someUser/someProject/release/latest.tar.g...` and also get the `tar.gz.sha256` file (if they even publish one ...).

Curl supports resuming a partial file (assuming the sending server also does) but it can't "know" ahead of time that the first 1/3 of the file I am downloading has already been fetched because it's also used by $someOtherArtifact.

> One of the advantages of a real package manager is that it checks signatures on the content that is downloaded.

So does docker/podman.

> The supply chain on a linux distro's package repos is much harder to break into than typosquatting into a docker registry somewhere.

Perhaps. For every "secure" package repo, I'll show you a much more up-to-date package in AUR/Nix.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: