Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Instead of creating multiple wikis with probably 80% of duplicate information between them

>why not try to turn it into a shared project?

This is basically both the highlight and the bane of the Linux world.

Why have another DE when there are already multiple ones? [0]

Why have another package manager when there are already multiple ones? [1]

Why have another distro when there are already multiple ones? [2]

So having another wiki makes perfect sense (or not depending on your POV)

0, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_X_Window_System_...

1, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_package_manag...

2, https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=popularity



>Why make a green bikeshed when there's already a red bikeshed?

Because then you have two bikesheds. An important aspect of the fact that the bikeshed exists, as a separate entity not integrated with the house, is that you can choose a different one. Specifically, the one that's already painted the way you want.

Maybe you don't think this is a feature in your current circumstance. Others do, which is why it persists.


Bane? It's what makes the Linux desktop great. I get to choose a system that works like I want.

Imagine if there was only Gnome or whatever unholy monstrosity is the most popular DE these days.


If there were only one, someone would launch a new one within a week. Just how Linux is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: