Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The diplomatic attempts on the US' behalf have been absolutely bewildering towards Iran. At first they refuse to negotiate, so the US lets them draw their own lines besides nuclear weapons. So Iran draws non-WMD "red line" clauses, and America ignores those immediately. Weeks of negotiating later, no signs of good-faith discussion from the US lead to the hammer coming down because there was "no other way" to solve it.

If it wasn't so goddamn confusing, it would almost appear deliberate. Between this and the US suing Yemen for peace, it's looking like a good decade to strongarm America's soft power.



It gets worse -- the person leading the negotiations with the US was one of the targets:

> Ali Shamkhani has been severely injured in a strike targeting his house and hospitalized. Mr. Shamkhani is currently spearheading nuclear talks committee appointed by supreme leader and is former secretary of National Security Council

https://x.com/farnazfassihi/status/1933360333118111907


>So Iran draws non-WMD "red line" clauses, and America ignores those immediately.

How so? What non-WMD red line clauses do you mean?


It’s because American foreign policy is not dictating the future of this, it’s Israel’s project and they are directing things. America has never had any success negotiating anything in the Middle East. We take what’s given to us.


America's foreign policy forged the first Iran deal. Clearly there was intent to try the same approach a second time, clearly it didn't work.

> America has never had any success negotiating anything in the Middle East.

Trump hasn't, let's be clear. But given his posturing towards the Gaza conflict it really shouldn't surprise you that his credit with Arabs is rock bottom.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: