Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The article has wrong facts. The columbia journalism review author double counted inflation. The NYTimes piece he cites has already adjusted for inflation in the 1967 IBM Market cap.


True:

CORRECTION: Let me rap myself on the knuckles here for the above update, which was flat incorrect. As commenter JD points out, IBM’s 1967 market cap was not $1.3 trillion in real dollars, it was $192.3 billion. The NYT’s data was already adjusted for inflation.

http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/misleading_and_incomplete_cove....

Or, $28 billion nominal.


This is by far the most important comment on the page. Very frustrating that, when I read it, it was nowhere near the top.


I totally agree.


Agreed




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: