Why can't we examine factually the thinking that pushes policy affecting million... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		aredox 8 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Dilbert creator Scott Adams says he will die soon ... Why can't we examine factually the thinking that pushes policy affecting millions of citizens by repeateadly claiming "Americans won't pay tarriffs"? And does it over and ove again, on DEI, immigrants, transexuals, their politcal opposition, etc.? Why should we always handle the topic with kiddy gloves when it is staring us in the face and breaking thousands of lives? Isn't that literaly "political correctness"?

concordDance 8 months ago [–]

Examining is fine in my book. But examining the ability to think of recognizably distinct demographics should be done with great care and sensitivity.

And that was not an examination, just some low effort attacks on the out group.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact