Being a bit polarised (and really most newspapers have a political leaning and this is part of the reason subscribers pick them!) is a very different thing from 'ragebait'.
And really Trump is doing enough to warrant rage, all the guardian needs to do is report on it :)
At a certain point it becomes irrational to do anything else. When you know that the other side will entirely ignore all the facts that don’t fit their narrative and is inherently dishonest and hypocritical. Well.. it becomes a waste of time.
Also “fact-free, ad hominem” pretty much describes 95% of what is coming from a certain person’s mouth. Why would you have significantly higher standards for some random internet person?
And really Trump is doing enough to warrant rage, all the guardian needs to do is report on it :)