Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you ask Grok, it will point you to the source. But let me do that for you below.

Original Transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/2v8g39z2ab1jo0waj6tn4/AJhMeQd...

MR. BILL WHITAKER: And yet Prime Minister Netanyahu seems to be charting his own course. The Biden-Harris Administration has pressed him to agree to a ceasefire, he's resisted. You urged him not to go into Lebanon, he went in anyway. Does the U.S. have no sway over Prime Minister Netanyahu? VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: The aid that we have given Israel allowed Israel to defend itself against 200 ballistic missiles that were just meant to attack the Israelis, and the people of Israel. And when we think about the threat that Hamas, Hezbollah presents Iran, I think that it is without any question our imperative to do what we can to allow Israel to defend itself against those kinds of attacks. Now, the work that we do diplomatically with the leadership of Israel is an ongoing pursuit around making clear our principles, which include the need for humanitarian aid, the need for this war to end, the need for a deal to be done which would release the hostages, and create a ceasefire. And we're not going to stop in terms of putting that pressure on Israel, and in the region, including Arab leaders.

Edited Transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/2v8g39z2ab1jo0waj6tn4/AJhMeQd...

MR. BILL WHITAKER: And yet Prime Minister Netanyahu seems to be charting his own course. The Biden-Harris Administration has pressed him to agree to a ceasefire, he's resisted. You urged him not to go into Lebanon, he went in anyway. Does the U.S. have no sway over Prime Minister Netanyahu? VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: The work that we do diplomatically with the leadership of Israel is an ongoing pursuit around making clear our principles.

PS: The above transcripts were linked from CBS site: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-publishes-transcript...



I don't understand how you think this is a smoking gun? He mentioned military aid in the part you cut out of your quote of the transcript. She responded to that by characterizing the military aid and why it was necessary, but they cut out her response to the mention of military aid because they wanted a response to only the second part of Whitaker's statement (ie the "no sway" part). Seems reasonable for a TV interview that needs to fit a tight schedule, no?


Those links are the same.

How do either of those help or hurt Trump?


fixed the link.

RE: How do either of those help or hurt Trump? I am not going to speculate that. But looking at the diff of the edit, anything of "substance" is removed from the response, and what remains is a non-answer.


It is both candidates competing to outdo each other on who will drop more bombs. It is a smoking gun, but not in the way you think it is.

That CBS should owe trump money or face any sort of repercussions over the perceived sleight is absolutely ridiculous. This is the behavior of a narcissistic snowflake, not grown man and last of all a president.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: