>This is a typical anti-finance rant, with no substence. The only thing that would have made it worse would be a blantently political statement any of the parties.
Because finance in itself is something like nature, and not at all political and ideological, right?
Because finance in itself is something like nature, and not at all political and ideological, right?
The math in his post is clearly, scientifically wrong and represents a typical rant from an uninformed observer. It would be the equivalent of workers blaming computer scientists (hackers) for eliminating all of their jobs that were based around making phone books.
Because finance in itself is something like nature, and not at all political and ideological, right?