Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


To quote the parent:

> Spending public money on unproductive work makes society weaker for everyone else.

I don't think anyone's spending public money on HN.


I don't think anyone's spending public money on HN.

There are plenty of .edu's and .gov's logging in to HN.


While they might be using an email address from a public service doesn't mean they are browsing HN while on the job.


Clearly you've never examined the logs of a public forum such as this.

I administer one (about 60,000 average monthly users), and it's loaded with connections from such institutions.

It's always delightful to see someone talking stupid about science get smacked down by someone with a nasa.gov connection.


You missed the word "public". If private individuals or foundations want to spend their own money on whatever then go ahead. But if bureaucrats are allocating tax dollars then there needs to be more careful scrutiny and accountability for results. Is it better to spend public money on this, or a replacement for the HMNZS Manawanui research ship? There are limited funds to go around.

https://maritime-executive.com/article/new-zealand-navy-surv...


"fiscal responsibility" and railing about public money are usually just ruses used by people pushing a political agenda.

I've had countless discussions with people who want to spend billions on sports stadiums and the military but then scream endlessly about "big government" when it comes to the arts and education.

They'll bail out wall street at the drop of a hat and then shrug with big eyes, "where's the money going to come from" when someone brings up say, having an anthropology department at UCLA.

It's an obvious bullshit game of a political project masquerading as virtue that you'd have to be a toddler to fall for. I don't care.


I'm not sure where that unhinged rant came from but it has zero relevance to my comment. Ultimately there are only a limited pool of funds to allocate so hard choices have to be made and some people won't get what they want.


No. That's not how currency works when you're the issuer.

Thinking that way is already baking yourself into Murray Rothbard.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: