> So the crappy face in the front, the pods for the sound, the dedicated chip for all the AR functions, and the separation of battery and headset are copies of everybody else?
Do you really consider those things innovations? I mean, the whole transparent eye thing is new for a production product like AVP, but still a pretty old idea. Maybe it originally came from Apple, I don't know. But dedicated chip for AR is definitely NOT a new idea nor innovative, nor is separation of battery and headset. It's definitely a lot more polished with those things than anything that's been built before, but polish != innovation
It’s very convenient that anything newly brought to market is not an innovation because it was presented as a concept somehwere but anything that isn’t new is simply a copy.
There’s no room in that kind of discussion space to talk about the actual details of implementation or anything with nuance that differentiates products.
Do you really consider those things innovations? I mean, the whole transparent eye thing is new for a production product like AVP, but still a pretty old idea. Maybe it originally came from Apple, I don't know. But dedicated chip for AR is definitely NOT a new idea nor innovative, nor is separation of battery and headset. It's definitely a lot more polished with those things than anything that's been built before, but polish != innovation