Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Andy Grove on Web 2.0 and the Valley: Slackers (alleyinsider.com)
14 points by alexwg on Jan 6, 2009 | hide | past | favorite | 13 comments


This sentence made me laugh out loud:

"These Web 2.0 companies are surfing on the old wave. They're not creating the next one," says analyst Navi Radjou of Forrester Research

I'm not old enough to know either way, but I wonder if attitudes are always similar to this during a recession.


I had some good laughs at the linked article, which had some "insights" on my favorite whipping boy, digg. Quoting Kevin Rose, - '"Things change in the shower in the morning," he says.'

Business week seems generally shoddy to me. This article seems a classic example - throw some random punditry together (aim for big, publicly identifiable names though settle for companies with big PR budgets) that's semi-relevant to current news, add some overdramatic narrative, and don't forget the obligatory call for new tax incentives to further advance innovation. It's a big mishmash of junk.

Watch out for the auto-starting video that further proves my point.


'the U.S. ceded the market for computer batteries to Japan in the 1970s. Now it's way behind in the race to invent improved batteries for electric vehicles'

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't A123 Systems a leader in this field?


Yea they are, don't know what this guy is thinking... maybe he doesn't count companies on the east coast?


You kids get off my lawn!


Go make better batteries!


There has always been a "get rich quick" vein to the Bay Area, ever since the gold rush. I think that's one of the reasons that it's not the most pleasant place to live. When everyone's thinking "ok, get in, make money, get out", no one's thinking much about stuff like schools, parks, infrastructure.


Silicon Valley has problems, but schools, parks, and infrastructure are not among them. In these it is among the best in the US.


I guess I'm a bit biased - I moved there the first time from Portland, Oregon, which at least in terms of parks and infrastructure, is definitely better. Where are you getting the school information from?



I live in SV with two young children. In the right area, the schools are superb. The problem is that you need to be able to afford to live in los gatos, saratoga, cupertino, or palo alto.

Other districts have good elementary schools, but poor middle/high schools. Or they are far enough away from the core areas that you pay a pretty huge price in commute time.

In summary, SV offers great public schools for affluent parents.


Exactly. What Davidw really meant was that Portland was cheaper, not that it was better.


I see some patterns in different tech areas.

SF, downtown Boston/Cambridge, and NYC all have pretty bad public schools, some nice parks, and at times annoyingly crowded but workable roads.

Palo Alto, Arlington and points north, and Long Island each have better schools, more open spaces, and less congestion.

This clearly has a lot less to do with startup centers and more a generally to do with population density in and around urban areas.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: