Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It did feel emotive but this wasn't the main point. Data is harder to get (or more expansive) and more polluted.


Felt super emotive to me, the problems the author is outlining, a) might not be an actual problems b) just require new thinking to solve


The problems are well-known and highly-documented. You should leave the determination of (b) up to those who know and understand (a), which includes the author.


It does poison the article, when someone is talking about subject X, and then they feel the need to insert their political opinion about person Y and that dont' like that Z is left-wing/right-wing. It makes them seem not at all objective, and calls into doubt what else they are not being objective about in their article.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: