Google pays $billions to Apple to be "unfairly" favored for search, Amazon doubtless pays Microsoft extremely well for similar treatment.
It'd be nice if Waterstones' legal folks could do something...but my bet would be "nope".
*) I'd say clearly marked but of course the [Ad] is kept in toned down colors to make it not obvious
Google pays $billions to Apple to be "unfairly" favored for search, Amazon doubtless pays Microsoft extremely well for similar treatment.
It'd be nice if Waterstones' legal folks could do something...but my bet would be "nope".