Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I don't really see the big deal here. Who wants to approve and configure all of their language servers?

everyone

> If you open a file for that language, is there ever a time you would deny the download?

every time

default should be offline imo. want to download something? do it manually and place in folder etc



> everyone

Are you really so self-centered that you can't imagine anyone doesn't care?

I'll raise my hand and say I personally am happy to trust Zed and am fine with auto-installing whatever binaries they propose.

I do think it's reasonable to have an option for people with different security postures, but don't assume you speak for everyone.


Just migrated from Vim to NeoVim. Downloading and configuring all the various LSPs has genuinely been one of the most frustrating aspects.


Then you’d click the „yes and never ask me again” if a prompt about whether you want to download a random binary showed up. But a lot of people wouldn’t want to click that and would either click „no and never ask me again” or vet each case one by one


How are you going to "vet" the language server when it pops up?

It's not a "random binary" either, it's a hosted binary for language features coming from the zed developers github release.

Even if the binary was compiled on demand when you clicked the button, were you going to go through the entire source of node to verify?


> How are you going to "vet" the language server when it pops up?

You may not vet the source of the language server, but you might want to determine which ones you are willing to trust/take the risk, and which ones you aren't.


With Vim + ALE this is dead easy: Install LSP servers via your OS package manager, and ALE will find them in $PATH and use them.

If you want to use NeoVim, then LSP-zero + Mason was also a decent experience last I tried.


just use mason


mason can install them, but there isn't a way to "ensure-installed" built in. So that was a second package I needed. Then I needed a third package to configure things.

Maybe I'm missing something, but it was definitely more complicated than "just use mason".


> everyone

Not true, everyone is not you, I don't want to.


a classic HN comment! "everyone is just like me"

absolutely incorrect, i loved that it does it for me and do not care even in the slightest and in fact this is 1000x preferable to vscode asking me.

what on earth made you think this was a reasonable reply.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: