Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
rbanffy
on June 8, 2012
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Study of 49 programmers: static type system had no...
> I've heard of big Ruby projects with test suites that take 20+ hours to run.
I'd assume those tests go well beyond type checking.
cageface
on June 8, 2012
[–]
Sure but remember most static languages are 20+ times faster than Ruby so even with compile times you might still come out way ahead.
aidenn0
on June 8, 2012
|
parent
[–]
Ah, but a lot of bugfixes are developed by making small changes to understand better what is going on internally during the bug symptom, and there the compile time is more important than the compile/test time.
cageface
on June 9, 2012
|
root
|
parent
[–]
True, and languages that are slow to compile like C++ really suffer here. But Java and Go compile so quickly it's hardly an issue.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
I'd assume those tests go well beyond type checking.