Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, YouTube is big enough to put their own cache nodes directly in ISP datacenters


Which would help for the crazy popular meme videos, but I bet the long tail on YouTube is insanely big, even if you did have the “watch next” engine getting in on the game steering you toward content already present in your nearby caches.


YouTube is estimated to have 1 exabyte [1] of data. Petabyte level storage is not unheard of [2], and a gateway server with 5PB storage would cover ~0.5% of all YouTube videos, which should be sufficient to serve a very high percentage of the most popular videos.

They can still afford to serve the occasional obscure video from the origin servers.

[1] https://www.qqtube.com/blog/how-much-storage-does-youtube-ha...

[2] https://www.qnap.com/solution/petabyte-storage/en/


Yup! This is the reason why its so cheap for them. Other companies in similar positions have cache nodes in the ISPs and this dramatically lowers the cost


Bingo, and also in Internet Exchanges - every ISP at KCIX the exchange has direct handoff to YouTube, Google, NetFlix, Cloudflare, ...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: