Current rent control and just plain tenant law is going to preempt something outrageous (you write as the lease makes outrageous demands but don't give details - California limits what can be considered a nuisance[1]). There's a reason most leases in California follow a boiler plate format. A lease that isn't legal isn't going to go well during an eviction attempt. And remember, an eviction has to be ordered by a court and can always be challenged there.
Contracts just generally can't preempt rights. Of course, the type of contract is important. Ordinary residential tenants have rights. If you're a commercial tenant, any imaginable conditions are possible.
It is less about any of the terms being individually outrageous, the point is more that there are sixty-three pages of them.
They were clearly boilerplate forms, from several sources (hence the overlap and contradictions), "If any terms of this Addendum conflict with the Lease, the terms of this Addendum shall be controlling," etc., 6 documents and 20 pages after some other terms on the same subject. I claim to have read it, but I make no claims about having understood it.
There is an asymmetry of resources here that gives a large property management company a lot of ability to make your life unpleasant (and rent control gives them a good reason to want to). By the time you end up in court you have already lost.
Contracts just generally can't preempt rights. Of course, the type of contract is important. Ordinary residential tenants have rights. If you're a commercial tenant, any imaginable conditions are possible.
[1] https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/eviction-tenant/notice-types