> a commercially developed language in that its developers are clearly incentivized to add more features.
Do you have any evidence this is true? Most programming languages are developed either by a company (C#, Java, Swift, Go) or heavily influenced by many companies (Python, JavaScript, C++). Java had been criticized forever (until very recently) for it's slow pace of development and it was 100% controlled by either Sun or Oracle.
Comments like these show just how little developers investigate the reasons why features they personally dislike were introduced to a language.
As a professional Java developer its new feature pace is still slow. It’s a little better but it hasn’t been fast in a VERY long time.
But that’s OK. They do an amazing job of maintaining backwards compatibility and making things fit in the language well as well as trying to get it right the first time.
Some languages are more willing to remove things that don’t work. Others are willing to have multiple different attempts that all work completely differently every few years.
In many ways that’s just not Java’s style. And that’s OK.
F# is not mainstream lang - it’s more like Clojure for .NET. My point was - you don’t have that variety in .NET as in JVM (Scala, Kotlin, Groovy are all relatively mainstream)
Kotlin is only mainstream on Android because Google says so, Groovy is barely kept alive thanks Gradle, and if it wasn't for Kafka and Spark, Scala would have been long gone.
Don’t get me wrong F# seems like a nice lang but definitely not mainstream (non geeks don’t use purely functional langs).
You can’t deny Kotlin is bigger lang than F# by any ranking from those popular (Tiobe) to unknown ones and is build on top of much bigger ecosystem (JVM) - that’s IMHO much more important factor for anyone doing commercial projects.
Additionally there is a big incentive to use it over Java (if you are stuck with older JDK) contrary to using F# over C#
Kotlin as a lang is better than C# (which is normal - it’s newer) and has better default IDE (IntelliJ) than anything on the market.
Well a bit exaggerated. Seen two Fortune 500 companies moving all never stuff to Kotlin on backend on my own eyes (for the reason I mentioned above) in some branches.
Do you have any evidence this is true? Most programming languages are developed either by a company (C#, Java, Swift, Go) or heavily influenced by many companies (Python, JavaScript, C++). Java had been criticized forever (until very recently) for it's slow pace of development and it was 100% controlled by either Sun or Oracle.
Comments like these show just how little developers investigate the reasons why features they personally dislike were introduced to a language.