No need for a nested array. You can simply lay them end to end in decreasing siz... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		colanderman on April 2, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Binary array set No need for a nested array. You can simply lay them end to end in decreasing size and perform in-place merges. The structure is implicit in the size of the set.

keybored on April 2, 2024 [–]

Okay, I was looking at the Rust implementation (nested Vec).

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact