Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Convinced is a strong word, but phones are typically running code that is not user controlled in an environment where they are always expected to be connected to the internet.

Given the amount of spying that has been revealed (a lot of it seeming to be superficially illegal) it seems reasonable to assume that phones are compromised in all manner of ways unless proven otherwise. I'd prefer to be pleasantly surprised.

Anything that makes it more expensive for the government to read someone's communications is a bonus. Ideally panopticon states will remain uneconomic.



"convinced" is absolutely the word, and my reasoning is posted as a sibling to your message




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: