No, not really. Following my values usually feels neutral. Sometimes it feels absolutely terrible.
What I'm trying to tell you is that this is an intrinsic goal, not an instrumental goal. If you were to ask me, "why do you have values?" or "why do you follow your values?" I wouldn't even know how to answer, it would be like asking a fish why it swims.
Alternatively; why do you do things you enjoy? Why do you do things that benefit you? Why does it matter to derive benefit?
---
As far as I see it, the point of contention here is that you believe there exists only one intrinsic goal. I not only disagree but contend that I experience other intrinsic goals.
At this point, I don't really see how one of us could convince the other. You don't believe my self-reported experience for one reason or another. I know I have other intrinsic goals, so your hypothesis is exploded from my perspective. I was trying to demonstrate that you don't have access to other people's experiences and can't really know what motivates them, but you seem unmoved.
But if you have a different idea or line of argument I'm happy to entertain it.
A fish swims because a fish swims. (It's an idiom.)
> Only one? No.
If you actually believed this I don't think you'd have much reason to doubt me when I said I had an intrinsic goal other than selfishness. Why would you unless you believed it was impossible?
> Frankly, I don't believe you do things from which you derive neither benefit nor satisfaction.
This would seem to imply you do believe there exists only one intrinsic goal. So I'm not really sure what you're trying to say.
Is it possible to have an intrinsic goal other than selfishness, or isn't it?
Why?