Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think if you read his comment just a little more carefully you'll see what I was responding to. I don't have a "side" in this particular debate.


I totally don't understand what you're on about, sorry. Paul summed up my point perfectly.

You seem to be forming a habit of ascribing things to me I didn't say. It's getting a little embarrassing/annoying.


> Apart from mini-crashes.

The Flash Crash was caused by the NYSE's faulty time-stamping system. It essentially broadcast false information that caused traders to think there was an arbitrage opportunity. This was entirely the NYSE's fault. See here for details: http://www.nanex.net/20100506/FlashCrashAnalysis_Part3-1.htm...

> And massive profits for companies that create nothing

They prevent you from paying even more to corrupt exchange specialists. This creates billions of dollars a year in value. They also have a neat ability to help the market recover from irrational crashes in 20 minutes, instead of lingering there for days or months while everyone is too scared to provide liquidity.

> and actually were the cause of the recent financial meltdown.

HFT is completely unrelated to the financial meltdown. The financial meltdown was caused by a housing bubble. HFT market makers don't even trade mortgage-backed securities. Those were traded over-the-counter (basically via phone calls) by investment banks.

If you don't know what these words mean, then look them up instead of complaining about it. If you want to make a point, it is your obligation to understand the subject matter. Don't argue about things you don't understand.


"All you've done is talk about the process with as many technical words as you could"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: