Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A great many papers in my field contain contextual details about the settings the studies were conducted in that would effectively deblind them.

That sort of betrays the idea of a pre-print, in my opinion, because they should not depend on "Someday we'll come back and fix this".



How does conventional peer review work for those papers?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: