So you are saying that in the context of an article about low-rank adaptation, where I was talking about applying this to ResNets, there was actually confusion that I was referring to long range radio?
As someone who is familiar with LoRa, but not LoRA, I was confused as to what they could have possibly been using LoRa for to finetune an LLM. The internet has a lot of acronyms, and a lot of jargon, and a lot of people doing seeming absurd things, okay?
I'm not the one who originally commented to complain about your capitalization, but sure.
Even if not in this specific comment thread, maybe having correct capitalization here means someone else knows how to write the one they mean to talk about in another conversation later, and then it will have been helpful.
If everyone went around calling both of them LORA all the time absolutely that's going to sometimes have people talking past each other about different technologies. Even with them capitalized correctly it's still going to, but not as much.
Too bad Microsoft didn't call theirs LoRaA and it would've been more obvious.
Yep, i clicked on it, because i thought it was about LoRa (the radio protocol). LoRa has many capabilities and many uses, from simple signalization and telemetry data to full on mesh networks for chat based communication, and, well... there are many things that could be fine tuned there :)
