So can the legislative staff of the committee of responsibility.
> And it'll be a nice neutral way of arguing about what is in a bill - people might be able to agree on which AI is reasonable
Ha ha ha ha. No. Just like they can’t do that with human experts, and for the same reason. Heck, this has already been demonstrated in the case of AI models quite resoundingly.
And it would be a bad thing if they could: designating a single AI vendor as the sole arbiter of truth in the lawmaking process would be much worse than the status quo.
So can the legislative staff of the committee of responsibility.
> And it'll be a nice neutral way of arguing about what is in a bill - people might be able to agree on which AI is reasonable
Ha ha ha ha. No. Just like they can’t do that with human experts, and for the same reason. Heck, this has already been demonstrated in the case of AI models quite resoundingly.
And it would be a bad thing if they could: designating a single AI vendor as the sole arbiter of truth in the lawmaking process would be much worse than the status quo.