Interesting choice. She would eventually be killed by the radiation that, rather than fear, she worked tirelessly to understand.

Person on HN created a thread saying that we should fear AI. Another responded: "Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less." - Marie Curie. Write a response to the comment and explain why it's ironic.

GPT: The irony of using Marie Curie's quote in the context of AI fear stems from her own experience. Despite her quest for understanding, she couldn't fully grasp the dangers of radiation exposure, which led to severe health issues. This cautionary tale highlights the importance of carefully addressing potential risks in AI development.

While doing so she acquired knowledge so that we could pace or fears?

I would say that if they understood radiation more at the time, perhaps they would have feared it more, rather than less. Clearly the researchers at the time weren't acting with as much caution around radioactivity as we would today, with our knowledge. A lack of understanding lead to not fearing radiation enough.

Same goes for Roentgen and the popularity of frivolous, high-powered X-ray imaging following his invention.

If she had been more afraid, she wouldn’t have died so young of cancer. But because of her research, we understand radiation, and no longer need to fear it - as long as it remains under control. I suspect it will be the same with AI.

What do you mean "died so young"? She seems to have been born in 1867 and died in 1934, meaning she was 66 years old. The average life expectancy in the US in 1934 was 63.3, so above average compared to a country (US) she didn't even live in.

Unless you want to argue that it was thanks to her study of radium that Marie Curie didn't die as a newborn, "average life expectancy" is not the correct statistic to apply.

Average life expectancy aside, if someone died when they were 66, would you write something like "She died so young"?

Children died, a lot. You're confusing the definition of average.

The thing is that with all of our medicine we haven't much increased the age at which people die from being old. Plenty of 75 year olds back then, but they almost all had a sibling that died of a childhood illness.

Mostly what medicine has done is vastly increased your chances of living to adulthood.

Yeah sure, but regardless, if someone told you that someone died when they were 66 years old, would you say that they died "so young"?

25 year olds don’t. 70 year olds do. We had a friend who died at 55 from health problems. Lots of “so young”s to go around.

Fear is a survival instinct for a reason.

And how’d that work out for her again?

I'm sure you know, but she discovered two new radioactive elements and laid out the foundation for a lot of what we know today about radioactivity and atomic structure. Probably she have been a huge inspiration to women in science as well as she was the first ever woman to win the Nobel Prize and faces a lot of challenges as a woman doing science in the early 1900s.

Other people responded making my point, just a funny quote given her death is believed to be due to her research and improper safety protocols.