The article is kind of low quality. First they name Peter Thiel as the poster child for libertarianism. Second they accuse libertarians being against state intervention. Third they say libertarians are asking for state help, so they think they've found a kind of paradox.

But Peter Thiel withdraw his money from SVB in time and he didn't ask for the government's help. So the article authors are kind of contradicting themselves.

Also, blaming libertarians for being against massive state intervention in economy is akin to blaming a fish because he swims in water. It's all what that fish is about and knows to do.