Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Of course it was about the cost. The article doesn't mention any reasons why they would have to cut costs, though.


No, it's not "of course it's because of the cost" because it could have been for another reason, and (thank God) the article wasn't about why Google would cut back on a perk. If it was, I wouldn't have read it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: