Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is nonsense because the people that were laid off at Google (as one example) were not selected by their tenure or having been hired during pandemic or during the remote phase, nor was it based on performance reviews.

People who had been there 12, 13, 16 years; people who had been just promoted. People who were senior management. People who were engineers. People who were on mat leave...

Management there effectively fed people's employee numbers through a random generator. And people who (IMHO naively/foolishly) gave their lives to the company suffered.

Decisions to overhire during the pandemic impacted people who had nothing to do with that decision. And not just because of the layoffs, but also because the company growth during that period was so intense that it led to onboarding and project mgmt difficulties as well.



Not to minimize how much it must suck to get laid off when you haven't prepared for it, but when you say:

> And people who (IMHO naively/foolishly) gave their lives to the company suffered.

they didn't "give their lives" for nothing, right? Didn't they trade it for an incredibly desirable compensation package?


Yes, Google's compensation is extremely generous.

But my experience when working there is that there are definitely people whose emotional (and physical) engagement with their jobs goes well beyond just what is required to get that compensation.


Apparently all support check in were targeted so it was performance based




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: