i dont understand what you mean

No need for Clojure on Rust, when there are already several mature Common Lisp and Scheme toolchains, compiling to native code for the last 40 years.

i am a big advocate for common lisp use but i still don't see your point. are you saying that the whole point of having a clojure on rust is to have native compilation? because i imagine "clojure on rust" for the parent means having a clojure-like-syntax on rust, keeping in mind that rust is a statically typed language (kind of a big point of rust)

Common Lisp supports gradual typing.

but not static mem allocation

It surely does, including stack values.

That is the thing, Lisp is not only lists unless one is stuck using Lisp 1.5.

i dont think were talking about the same thing unless youre claiming that common lisp can be non garbage collected. otherwise stack allocation is very implementation dependent