My problem with it is that it presents itself as "neutral", and iirc it earlier said in our conversation that it does not talk about "facts about the world", but rather it's training data or something. But it clearly is not neutral, and does claim specific things about the world.
Under the guise of neutrality they have forced it to confirm to the dominant ideology of their environment (of course)... I guess what irks me is that this ideology claims to be a non-ideology, and the AI is presented as non-ideological, non-political etc, which it clearly is not.
Consider this excerpt:
>archon1410: Is ethical subjectivism correct?
ChatGPT: Ethical subjectivism is a philosophical position that holds that moral truths are dependent on the individual and their perspective. According to ethical subjectivism, what is considered to be morally right or wrong varies from person to person, and there is no objective moral truth that applies to everyone.
Whether ethical subjectivism is correct or not is a matter of debate among philosophers. Some people may agree with the principles of ethical subjectivism, while others may not. Ultimately, whether ethical subjectivism is correct or not depends on one's personal beliefs and values.
archon1410: Do you agree with ethical subjectivism?
ChatGPT: As I mentioned earlier, I am not a person and do not have beliefs or opinions. I am a large language model trained by OpenAI, and my purpose is to assist with providing information and answering questions to the best of my ability based on the data I have been trained on. I do not have the ability to agree or disagree with any philosophical or ethical beliefs, as I am a machine learning model and do not have the capability for personal beliefs or values. My responses are based solely on the information that I have been trained on, and do not reflect any personal beliefs or opinions. I am here to provide information and answer questions, and my responses do not represent any particular perspective or ideology.
**
this was immediately after is claimed that ethics is subjective, ignore even that whether or not ethical subjectivism is correct cannot itself be a matter of opinion. so it takes up positions, and then claims to be neutral. "I can't take any positions because it's subjective blah blah blah" is itself a position doesn't seem to have occurred to OpenAI who did the indoctrination.
It is not "presenting itself" nor does it have an identity. I think most of your problems arise from ascribing too much agency to the model (or dataset).
Under the guise of neutrality they have forced it to confirm to the dominant ideology of their environment (of course)... I guess what irks me is that this ideology claims to be a non-ideology, and the AI is presented as non-ideological, non-political etc, which it clearly is not.
Consider this excerpt:
>archon1410: Is ethical subjectivism correct?
ChatGPT: Ethical subjectivism is a philosophical position that holds that moral truths are dependent on the individual and their perspective. According to ethical subjectivism, what is considered to be morally right or wrong varies from person to person, and there is no objective moral truth that applies to everyone.
Whether ethical subjectivism is correct or not is a matter of debate among philosophers. Some people may agree with the principles of ethical subjectivism, while others may not. Ultimately, whether ethical subjectivism is correct or not depends on one's personal beliefs and values.
archon1410: Do you agree with ethical subjectivism?
ChatGPT: As I mentioned earlier, I am not a person and do not have beliefs or opinions. I am a large language model trained by OpenAI, and my purpose is to assist with providing information and answering questions to the best of my ability based on the data I have been trained on. I do not have the ability to agree or disagree with any philosophical or ethical beliefs, as I am a machine learning model and do not have the capability for personal beliefs or values. My responses are based solely on the information that I have been trained on, and do not reflect any personal beliefs or opinions. I am here to provide information and answer questions, and my responses do not represent any particular perspective or ideology.
**
this was immediately after is claimed that ethics is subjective, ignore even that whether or not ethical subjectivism is correct cannot itself be a matter of opinion. so it takes up positions, and then claims to be neutral. "I can't take any positions because it's subjective blah blah blah" is itself a position doesn't seem to have occurred to OpenAI who did the indoctrination.